Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Utah v. Evans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Ichiro 05:28, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Utah v. Evans

Transwiki to Wikisource and either delete or rewrite into a real article. User:Zoe|^(talk) 21:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for cleanup. Supreme Court opinions are per se notable. Gazpacho 21:39, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Articles which contain nothing but a quote from the decision belong on Wikisource. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Excellent discussion of this Supreme Court case. -- JJay 22:38, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy~~ Keep Gazpacho's changes to the article make this a useful article on a notable Supreme Court case. Cedars 03:00, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Speedy~~ Keep its been cleaned up now thanks to Gazpacho -- Astrokey44|talk 15:55, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep implies that the nominiation was made in bad faith. I resent the implication. User:Zoe|^(talk) 22:43, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - I didnt mean that, its fair enough that it was nominated looking at what it was. but its been cleaned up now. You did say it should be rewritten into a real article which has been done. -- Astrokey44|talk 00:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  - It wasn't my intention to suggest that the article was a bad-faith nomination either. Cedars 01:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.