Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/User Services Platform
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:43, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- User Services Platform (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
New term that is not currently WP:notable created as a placeholder. While it may become so in time it is WP:TOOSOON. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 10:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Speedy Delete- Completely agreed with noq. Ireneshih (talk) 16:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:51, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:36, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:TOOSOON. No independent sources at all. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:29, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete as WP:TOOSOON. –Davey2010Talk 23:53, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.