Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urdusky (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train^talk 21:27, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Urdusky[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:GNG. Greenbörg (talk) 16:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:51, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Fails WP:GNG. — TheMagnificentist 09:32, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: The nomination and single !vote are examples of WP:JNN / WP:VAGUEWAVE; we need more extensive rationales to reach a consensus
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:52, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete given that searches don't produce anyone talking about it in a page or so of results— just Facebook pages and other link-backs. Mangoe (talk) 16:28, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.