Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/UrduPoint (3nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Closing per WP:RELIST, consensus to keep formed, no substative differences from earlier AfD discussions. Note: nomination by editor subsequently blocked indefinitely for disruptive editing. (non-admin closure) Goldsztajn (talk) 02:27, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

UrduPoint

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/UrduPoint
• Articles for deletion/UrduPoint (2nd nomination)
• Articles for deletion/UrduPoint (3nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

UrduPoint (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non-notable media outlet, I checked under the urdu name/spelling (اردو پوائنٹ) and found even less sourcing, which indicates to me that this is a complete notability fail despite the many attempts to spam it crosswiki. This new Pakistani TV channel has no references that demonstrate it meets the ">Parkashjit Singh30 18:06, 21 January 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion was not properly transcluded to the log until now.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 04:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Websites and Pakistan. Justiyaya 04:22, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

• Keep - per my arguments in the previous AfD. Insight 3 (talk) 05:02, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
• Weak keep - Although I couldn't find a lot of sources to demonstrate notability, there seems to be previous consensus to keep - there have been two past AfDs for this article, and both failed. The ⬡ Bestagon ^T/_C 09:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
• Keep although the subject is lacking of RS but its due to media race as no media outlet promotes each other, otherwise it's among the biggest media outlets in Pakistan. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 15:03, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.