Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Urban Griot

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. North America1000 12:06, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Urban Griot[edit]

Urban Griot (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NMUSIC. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it. - There isn't multiple sources for this subject. Currently the article is also unreferenced. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 18:19, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 19:05, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. There are multiple such sources, e.g. Allmusic, Jazz Times, Billboard. Also reviewed in Schwann Inside Jazz & Classical. --Michig (talk) 20:51, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. See above. It's a notable work by an incredibly—and indisputably—notable musician. XF641D9K (talk) 03:16, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Randykitty (talk) 18:28, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - notability clearly established by @Michig:'s sources. Nosebagbear (talk) 22:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep. I've added information from the sources listed by Michig. The article now meets WP:NALBUM criterion 1. EddieHugh (talk) 11:45, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.