Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ural Rakhimov

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 18:14, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ural Rakhimov[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No hint of person's significance. Huge problems with WP:GNG and WP:BIO Bash7oven (talk) 21:09, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and Russia. Shellwood (talk) 21:29, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. By Googling, you will find enough significant coverage in reliable sources in Russian and English. Passes WP:GNG. —Natalie RicciNatalie 00:34, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:05, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 03:31, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I don't really see anything about what makes this person notable. He might have "significant coverage in reliable sources," but that's only one part of GNG; the sources say that he's rich, but that's about all they say. Simply being rich and studying at a particular college do not make a person notable. Sleddog116 (talk) 15:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.