Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uptowncharlybrown

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ST47 (talk) 03:19, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Uptowncharlybrown[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet notability criteria at WP:NHORSERACING. The horse's noted win was in the Pasco Stakes, which is not a Grade I stakes race, and no indication of meeting other listed criteria. General coverage of the horse does not appear to be significant for WP:GNG.

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Horse racing-related deletion discussions. Dmoore5556 (talk) 04:03, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 05:33, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep the ESPN article in the article is significant coverage and the press coverage is sufficient for WP:GNG thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 14:59, 17 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Obvious WP:NHORSERACING fail. The press coverage is not sufficient for WP:GNG in my opinion, because the coverage is largely in the context of the Belmont Stakes and appears routine and not anything more than the average Belmont contender. I would point to WP:NOTWHOSWHO here. Aspening (talk) 22:09, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:34, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the Article for two reason. First, it's not notable itself and second, the article weak sources and coverage categorized it under WP:GNG.Forest90 (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.