Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upper Orakzai

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Apparently a stub which is not in itself a reason for deleting, merging or redirecting it. Angus McLellan (Talk) 19:44, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Upper Orakzai

Not a notable place. Thebluesharpdude (talk) 08:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Orakzai Agency. This article has little use.EJF (talk) 18:26, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Strongly Delete. It has little relevance. If anything at all, redirect as EFJ said. Shapiros10 (talk) 00:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - no context provided. -- Mark Chovain 02:57, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Shapiros10. Redirect if desired. --On the other side ^Contribs|@ 04:05, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Hate to melt the snow, but this appears to be a constituency in the National Assembly of Pakistan.[1] As such it would seem automatically notable. --Dhartung | Talk 05:27, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry Dhartung, but we should just redirect to the better article. Shapiros10 (talk) 13:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. A geographic area which just has to be cleaned up and wikified. --brew crewer (yada, yada) 16:44, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Orakzai Agency, the better article! Shapiros10 (talk) 21:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Would we delete an article on a US congressional district? A UK parliamentary constituency? Of course not. So why treat this differently? Phil Bridger (talk) 11:43, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to a better article with more information. It's not deleting an article on a section of Pakistan, we're deleting the content of this page and redirecting to the article with more information. Shapiros10 (talk) 18:20, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Perhaps WP:POKEMON applies. This is a district for the primary national legislative body in a major heavily populated country. As mentioned above, this is equivalent to any United States congressional district which consensus have long considered notable. --Oakshade (talk) 22:21, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Orakzai_Agency#Upper_Orakzai. The main content is there. This keeps the material safe and allows it to grow in context until there is enough to break it out into a standalone article in WP:Summary style. It's a win win situation. Most of these merge situations should be merged directly rather than being brought here to AfD. If the merge is challenged, then that is the time for a wider discussion. SilkTork *^{What's YOUR point?} 15:38, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.