Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upper Forni, California

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 12:14, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Upper Forni, California[edit]

Upper Forni, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. Fails WP:GEOLAND. This location is an isolated former homestead, now in the possession of the US Forest Service. Despite being listed in GNIS as a "populated place" (see WP:GNIS for more about the meaning and pitfalls of this classification), there is no evidence that there is or ever has been a community here. Although our standards for inclusion of geographical places are deliberately very low, they do not extend to individual homesteads or farms. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. −−− Cactus Jack 🌵 08:12, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete California's Geographic Names lists this as a "locality" and the "unincorporated community" description in our article is entirely unsourced. Another homestead mislabeled by GNIS, see WP:GNIS for more details on this phenomenon. –dlthewave 15:42, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Mass-produced blatantly false crap. Reywas92Talk 20:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete More of a home than a community. ~EDDY (talk/contribs)~ 22:46, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Per Nom and Dlthewave. Also thanks, I knew there was an error being exploited but now see it is more widely known. -- Otr500 (talk) 20:36, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.