Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Upendra Tripathy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 20:00, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Upendra Tripathy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

poor sources.I dont find him notable enough to be on wikipedia. Uncletomwood (talk) 10:26, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as per Phil Bridger on the previous AfD on the notability of the Award for Excellence in Public Administration. AllyD (talk) 10:52, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Phill Bridgers comment was wrong as the PM's award for excellence is given to almost 20-30 people out of 5-6 lakh government employees not the whole population of India every year.Moreover it looks like a WP:Resume and does not indicate why it has to be on wikipedia,it exists maybe because so and so wanted to show off.Wikipedia's articles need to provide knowledge not fan peoples or beaurecrats ego..Uncletomwood (talk) 10:59, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Theopolisme (talk) 00:55, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete he is a run of the mill civil servant who is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:57, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per John Pack Lambert. Also the one reference is a dead link. SalHamton (talk) 22:00, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.