Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up to Snuff

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep the article, no consensus on the author. Consensus for keeping the documentary is clear, while most of the opinions on the author appear to favour redirection or deletion or don't state an opinion on the author specifically. The category needs to be discussed at WP:CFD Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:37, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like I didn't notice that there is a deletion discussion up on the author as well; vacating any action here on the author article for that discussion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 13:20, 26 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Up to Snuff[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable documentary. At best, WP:TOOSOON, but certainly heavy WP:NPOV issues – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 01:16, 12 May 2019 (UTC) I am also nominating the following related pages, all created by Vajayhawk for promotional purposes:[reply]

– Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 01:26, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 01:16, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. – Broccoli & Coffee ^{(Oh hai)} 01:16, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. – John M Wolfson (talk • contribs) 05:32, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ keep This article does seem promotional, but the subject has won multiple festival awards. Although most are small time and the category nominations are all over the place, at least 3 are significant. Among references provided there is indeed some clutter, but at least 2 examples in RS--combined with the awards--should be enough to barely pass muster. As for the the other nominations, I agree Mark Maxey having his own article probably is WP:TOO SOON and should redirect here. Category:Films directed by Mark Maxey (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) and his entry in Category:People from Brambleton, Virginia (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) are a hard delete. ShelbyMarion (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

struck my "weak" above to a solid keep, based on references added since nomination. ShelbyMarion (talk) 15:23, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep PROMO tone needs clean-up. However, in addition to the awards, there has been feature story coverage, some of which I just added to the page. meets WP:NFP.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Up to Snuff as the article has been significantly improved as per WP:HEY and it's notability has been established. No vote! on Mark Macey but he needs at least one more notable production (having a Wikipedia article) if not more to pass WP:CREATIVE, while the categories need to go to WP:CFD thanks Atlantic306 (talk) 20:55, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 07:45, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per E.M.Gregory remarks and per Atlantic306 Lubbad85 (☎) 23:48, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.