Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Up (Justin Bieber song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Up (Justin Bieber song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

no expansion on why this song is significant enough to warrant its own article Transcendence (talk) 10:22, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article has just been created. Maybe we shouldn't bite the newbies ? --Ezhuks (talk) 11:02, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's a slightly tricky song to Google, but I can't see any evidence of it yet having reached a high chart position, or one any awards, sufficient to satisfy WP:NSONGS. I will gladly change my vote if anyone can find something I have missed. Oh, and nominating an article that has no references and no claims to notability or importance is not biting the newcomers. Articles can be drafted in userspace and should only be moved to mainspace when they have at least the minimum information required to satisfy the WP:GNG. If there is no sign of the article creator making immediate improvements to the article, then I don't see why anyone should feel under any obligation to hold off on dealing with it on its merits.--Korruski^Talk 11:35, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - WP:NSONGS. Not a single, no significance otherwise. Tarc (talk) 14:27, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NSONGS Doesn't belong on as it's own page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Breawycker (talk • contribs) 15:37, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete didn't chart, no sources, WP:PUTEFFORT, unlikely to be used as a redirect. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:20, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Dusti^*poke* 01:04, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.