Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untitled Spider Man Reboot (2017 film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 02:57, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Spider Man Reboot (2017 film)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A draft of this article sits at Draft:Spider Man (2017 film), I think it should sit there until we have enough reliable sources to write an actual article, as it sits now it's too soon to write a proper article. While I don't doubt that there will be an article in the (possibly near) future, now isn't the time as it will not be released for another +2 years. At this stage I think the mentions in various articles (as it is now) is sufficient. kelapstick^(bainuu) 14:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a very prospective issue given that all that is mentioned is a rumoured cast. This does meet the "commenced principal photography" qualifier for future movies in WP:NFF and is thereforeWP:TOOSOON. Walkabout14 (talk) 16:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Walkabout14 (talk) 16:41, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Too soon as no reliable source as stated that principal photography has begun. Geraldo Perez (talk) 18:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Some info might be moved to Spider-Man in film#Future but, until there is a confirmed release date, there isn't a reason to have an article or redirect with 2017 in the title. MarnetteD|Talk 18:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree that it could be mentioned in the above article, but it's obviously too soon if we're reporting rumors. Keeping a draft article around should be sufficient. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:40, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete this mainspace article per WP:NFF (and an inappropriate title anyways) and Delete Draft:Spider Man (2017 film). That is just a duplicate of Draft:Untitled Spider-Man film, which was created first and is the place where this info is going to be curated. - Favre1fan93 (talk) 18:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both this and Draft:Spider-Man (2017 film) per Favre1fan93. Sock (~~tock~~ talk) 19:28, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- This is all very confusing, however the draft that you link, redirects to Draft:Untitled Spider-Man film, which is actually the best of all the drafts/articles that we have on hand. --kelapstick^(bainuu) 19:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFF. Any confirmed details can be stored at Spider-Man in film#Future for the time being. There are currently two drafts at Draft:Untitled Spider-Man film and Draft:Spider Man (2017 film) and we only need one. The first one is superior so I agree with deleting the second. Betty Logan (talk) 23:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:16, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.