Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untimely
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 17:05, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
- Untimely (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable upcoming film, no independent secondary coverage, per WP:NFF BOVINEBOY2008 11:50, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor Talk! 11:59, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't find any reliable sources on this film; judging from the budget and the people involved, it is a small indie project. Fails NFF and GNG. Sam Sailor Talk! 12:01, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - per reasons by the user above. Neither could I find any reliable sources on the film by searching the web. Fails to meet notability criteria. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 12:23, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per failing WP:NFF and being TOO SOON. The topic can be reconsidered if or when it gets coverage. Schmidt, Michael Q. 06:23, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.