Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Until Proven Guilty

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As usual, this isn't prejudicial to the suggested redirect, which may be created at editorial discretion. —Cryptic 04:40, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Until Proven Guilty

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBOOK: cited sources are blogs failing WP:RS, no awards, no derivative works, not used in instruction, author not historically significant. Vrac (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:28, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Or maybe redirect to Nigel Hinton, but I've already tagged his article as possibly failing notability. I think he might come up for deletion soon, too. Regardless, there seems to be very little in the way of Google hits, and the presence of blogger reviews really just makes me doubt that I'm ever going to find anything useful. There are a whole series of poorly-sourced articles on books by Hinton, and I think it might be prudent to examine them in more detail. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:28, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:54, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:28, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient coverage in reliable sources (none) to support notability. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 02:04, 26 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.