Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unsolved problems in linguistics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Kirill Lokshin 03:25, 3 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
This isn't a list of unsolved problems in linguistics (and even if it were it would be unmaintainable), it's just a rather POV statement about the nature of language isolates. I see no potential for growth into a useful encyclopedia article. Delete. Angr/tɔk tə mi 20:18, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems like a weirdly matter-of-fact article. Devotchka 20:24, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: both of our pages have just been vandalized and I'm not even sure how... Devotchka 20:51, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I have absolutely nothing of use to say re: this particular AfD, but if you're talking about babelboxes, a vandal changed the templates earlier. If that's what it was, it wasn't related to you personally, nor this AfD. Jacqui ★ 06:03, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unsolved problems in this article include: lack of meaningful content. - Just zis Guy, you know? 21:44, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per nom. TheMadBaron 09:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.