Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unknown Crane
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. --Coredesat 07:41, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Speculation on a non-notable soap-opera character that has never been seen. yandman 13:42, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well, from what I gather from the article, there is apparently an in character reason that the character has yet to be seen. If this is a currently developing storyline, I'd prefer to give it a couple weeks to see how it plays out, maybe tag it with {{In-progress tvshow}}. Seems like a gray area of crystalballery to me. --Roninbk t c e # 13:53, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There is a mention in a recent soap opera digest that the show is looking to cast a new character named Susan who appears to fit the description of the Julian & Ivy's unknown daughter (smart, 20's, blonde, world travelled etc). The deletion should probably wait to see if this character is indeed the unnamed daughter and then merge or delete at that time.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 167.196.169.77 (talk • contribs)
- AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Coredesat 21:33, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete this absurdity. A fictional character for whom there is not even any fictional data, only fan-speculation? Get real. In more than one sense. Guy 22:22, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unverifiable, no out-of-universe references. Melchoir 22:35, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete or Merge per WP:FICTION. Vectro 04:23, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:V, WP:FICT, and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unknown Johnson. In addition, many of the articles about the characters on Passions ought to be cleaned up due to their overemphasis on genealogical information, including listing all of each character's uncles, aunts, nephews, and nieces whether or not those relatives' names have been identified on the show. --Metropolitan90 05:07, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.