Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unjaded Jade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ^Complex/_Rational 14:40, 2 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unjaded Jade[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Believe this person fails to meet the criteria of WP:GNG 1keyhole (talk) 09:06, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors, Women, Education, Internet, and England. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Coverage with two articles in the Times, a RS. Rest are helpful. Plenty notable. Oaktree b (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: I agree with Oaktree b on this one. Crunchydillpickle🥒 (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

•Keep- I agree with Oaktree b on this, the article is well written and well sources with reliable sources that prove notability. 😎😎PaulGamerBoy360😎😎 (talk) 18:40, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.