Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Valle Publishing Program
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- University of Valle Publishing Program (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
To delete as per WP:ORG. Thx Andremun (talk) 02:12, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colombia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:07, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:08, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Anyone looking for sources would probably be best advised to use the Spanish name of this organisation (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL). A quick look suggests a number of references in Spanish, but I'm not sure how many are independent or substantial. PWilkinson (talk) 14:58, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 06:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Seems to be a respectable university press. distinct enough to be worth covering separately. DGG ( talk ) 01:24, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.