Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Queensland Faculty of Health Sciences

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 20:11, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

University of Queensland Faculty of Health Sciences[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I'm nominating these 3 articles: University of Queensland Faculty of Health Sciences
University of Queensland Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences
University of Queensland Faculty of Business, Economics and Law.

They are all not even stub quality, they're simply lists. Moreover, those lists already exist verbatim in the original article University of Queensland. I don't see any possibility of them expanding either since they are just lists of schools underneath each, of which some have their own articles (like TC Beirne School of Law). If the sub faculties need articles they can be on each one specifically, but we don't need 3 hierarchies of lists to do it. Shadowjams (talk) 01:37, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as duplicate material. Also fails criteria for list inclusion. Joefridayquaker (talk) 02:42, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:07, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete all direct copy from faculty's website with no assertion of notability. LibStar (talk) 10:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:43, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have updated all three Faculties with more information about research and activities. If these three pages should be deleted than all the University Faculty pages should be deleted, namely regarding the University of Queensland Faculty of Arts, University of Queensland Faculty of Science and University of Queensland Faculty of Engineering, Architecture and Information Technology. The faculties include lists of research and other activities that should be included. EntropicPonderer (talk) 04:13, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've looked at your changes and I think the majority of my original reason remains accurate. In a way the "expanded" version only confirm my original fears for what these mid-hierarchical pages were expected to be. This applies to the ones you added as well, but I won't try to add them to this nomination, although I think they are fair game for a later nomination depending on the outcome of this one.

I don't have a problem with useful,e expanded pages about university departments, but these sets of pages to me feel totally unnecessary. There's no glory in creating pages just to create articles. And how does this possibly help a potential reader? Shadowjams (talk) 03:21, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, as information is duplicated in University of Queensland, and not yet long/significant enough for its own article. Mamyles (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.