Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Adelaide School of Dentistry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Bmusician 03:47, 4 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
University of Adelaide School of Dentistry[edit]
- University of Adelaide School of Dentistry (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Promotional tone; dubious notability. There's nothing in the article to indicate that it deserves its own article, separate from the University of Adelaide main article. — Preceding signed comment added by Cymru.lass (talk • contribs) 18:53, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Grahame (talk) 23:55, 26 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Normal editing can remove the "long and distinguished history of innovation," "intent to remain at the leading edge of best practice." "long and distinguished research history," "most advanced dental research centre in the southern hemisphere" type puffery and promotional language. Seems to satisfy notability as a School in a recognized and accredited major university. Edison (talk) 03:45, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have removed the puffery I found objectionable. Edison (talk) 03:54, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:55, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Wikipedia can provide a neutral encyclopedic summary of this topic. Let's do it. --99of9 (talk) 04:04, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Agree with 99of9. The problems are not with notability but article quality, and that alone is not reason enough to delete. --LauraHale (talk) 05:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.