Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University Transport System 428
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can be restored, I guess, if somebody really wants to merge or transwiki a lot of buscruft. Sandstein 10:42, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- University Transport System 428 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- Unitrans 3536–4350 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unitrans 3852–3861 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unitrans 4509–4510 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unitrans 4514–4515 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unitrans 5311–5312 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unitrans 6773–6774 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unitrans 9613–9616 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unitrans RLH21 & RLH34 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Unitrans RTL1194 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- University Transport System 2960 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
These kinds of pages should be on the CPTDB wiki or something similar (maybe even the Davis wiki), but are not appropriate for a general-purpose wiki like Wikipedia. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 15:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 17:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. sst✈ 17:07, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all Not suitable for their own articles here. Rcsprinter123 (spout) 17:38, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
- Merge whatever information is useful and sourced into Unitrans (possibly creating a new "Fleet" section?) and redirect there. --Regards, James(talk/contribs) 00:21, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 17:30, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I thought I AFD'd all these about 18 months ago? NordicDragon Talkpage 08:36, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
- No you didn't; you tagged them with
{{notable}}
- that is different from AfD. <<< SOME GADGET GEEK >>> (talk) 20:55, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
- Errr... No I didn't... I didn't tag any of them as that .. I AfD'd a whole load in August 2013 (under the pseudonym Tommie the Tomato) but they were all merged into Unitrans. NordicDragon Talkpage 08:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.