Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University District, San Bernardino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Any OR issues can be dealt with through the normal editing process. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:55, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

University District, San Bernardino[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and smacks of boosterism. The only real source mentions a "university district" in passing. TorriTorri(^talk/_contribs) 03:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:13, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't understand what the problem is. Most large cities, including San Bernardino, have separate articles about their significant neighborhoods. See Downtown San Bernardino; Arrowhead Springs, San Bernardino, California; Del Rosa, San Bernardino, California; etc. If the article is written in a boosterish way, that is a matter for editing, not deletion. --MelanieN (talk) 23:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: Do you doubt that the district exists, is that the problem? There are a ton of references to it under Google News]. Unfortunately most are pay-per-view so can't be cited directly, but they certainly provide plenty of evidence that there is such a place. --MelanieN (talk) 23:23, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep OK, this is OR but the place exists. It is a distinct area separated from other parts of the city.Sarcasto (talk) 01:00, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
KEEP This a significant and important neighborhood in the city of San Bernardino, TorriTorri needs to do at least google it and look for his/her self. Take a look at google maps. I would also like to say that you should add a needs improvement tag on the article rather than putting it up for deletion. I am really busy now a days so I don't have much time to edit, but that is not a reason to put an article up for deletion. House1090 (talk) 22:14, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.