Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Universal Explosion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, unverifiable and original research. Davewild (talk) 07:52, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Universal Explosion[edit]

Unreferenced and I can find nothing on google about this supposed sound effect. Not sure if it's non-notable or a hoax. Smacks of original research ("The earliest instance of the explosion I've heard") and unverifiability. Mangostar (talk) 03:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Attempt to identify another Wilhelm scream, but without sources. --Dhartung | Talk 03:47, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Considering it's written in first person, guessing it's WP:OR. Potatoswatter (talk) 03:48, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Proded. Isn't AfD a whole bunch of trouble? Potatoswatter (talk) 08:22, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, sure, but the prod won't expire until after the AFD does. --Dhartung | Talk 18:39, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, encyclopædia articles are not normally written in the first person. Seems an awful lot like WP:OR. It's no Wilhelm Scream, at any rate. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:28, 24 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete per nom.--Berig (talk) 16:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - original research with "classified ad" inserted. B.Wind (talk) 04:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.