Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unity of Command 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Unity of Command (video game)#Sequel. And obviously merge sourced material Spartaz ^Humbug! 02:36, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unity of Command 2[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete or move to draft. Game has not yet been released, and thus WP:TOOSOON has to be considered. SamHolt6 (talk) 17:33, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As the creator, I'd request to have it moved to draft, as per your suggestion. (if WP:TOOSOON is justified) Wargamer and Rock, Paper, Shotgun are reliable sources which talk about the game's development to a larger extent, although might not be quite enough at this time.Kiksam (talk) 17:37, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 17:48, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I strongly suggest merge and redirect to Unity of Command (video game)#Sequel. Deletion is certainly not the right call and neither is draftifying. Information about an upcoming sequel can and should be included in the first game's article. Regards So Why 18:09, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per SoWhy. --Izno (talk) 18:23, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - Not everything that isn't released is WP:TOOSOON. In this case, there are four references cited, and they seem pretty ok to me. Maybe a bit forced? Possibly. This informatoin could go into the previously stated article, but as there is media on the sequel, it's not really a cut and dry delete for me. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:56, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Even if not a WP:TOOSOON deletion, the WP:GNG requires sustained detailed coverage of a topic (in multiple works), which we don't have here. A merge and redirect to its preceding game makes a lot of sense. --Izno (talk) 20:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per SoWhy. Nomader (talk) 15:29, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. Too soon. Szzuk (talk) 21:10, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.