Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United World Telecom

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:50, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

United World Telecom

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable 25-person company, article posted as advertising or spam. Fails WP:RS as the only "sources" are a directory listing on "zoominfo.com", a BBB membership which the company bought and paid for and the company's own website. The "Awards" section is a joke - the supposed "awards" are that they obtained a license from the Federal Communications Commission and paid the annual fee to join the Better Business Bureau. *yawn*

There are thousands of tiny companies tinkering with voice over IP in one fashion or another. This article fails to explain why this particular hole-in-the-wall operator is a notable company. The repeated WP:COI edits from Special:Contributions/Baptiste UWT are also a huge red flag, although the worst has been reverted by now. K7L (talk) 16:55, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject fails WP:CORP. References do not meet criteria for conferring notability. A Google failed to yield anythng that rings the notability bell. Bottom-line: This is a small business, one of millions, with no real claim to encyclopedic notability. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:47, 30 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions OccultZone (Talk) 18:52, 30 May 2014 (UTC) [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.