Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United States and French Governments Compared
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:52, 22 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- United States and French Governments Compared (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
It's an essay; a comparison of the two. WP:NOT#OR. Leonard(Bloom) 23:14, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Sorry. All we need is the articles on each one so that we can compare them ourselves. (p.s. there are over 100 national governments in the world. Should we have 10,000 articles comparing each one to each other? [Of course I know that the USA and France are much more important than most in the history of government.]) :-) Steve Dufour (talk) 23:17, 17 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It's an essay. Additionally, I do not think that this can be salvaged, as this topic, in my opinion, will always be unencyclopedic. « D. Trebbien (talk) 00:01, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seems like a version of Government of France tailored to an American audience, i.e. without a global view. There is no particular reason we should make these comparisons; instead, we should make sure that the appropriate base article is complete and clear. --Dhartung | Talk 01:23, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it's a personal essay. Wikipedia is not a repository for your homework. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 01:24, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not because it isn't interesting, but Wikipedia doesn't encourage "apples and oranges" articles, where X is compared and contrasted with Y-- simply because there are infinite combinations of things that can be compared. The ban on "original synthesis" (as opposed to "original research") seems kind of harsh at first encounter, but it just means that the knowledge is placed elsewhere. I'd encourage the author to contribute to Government of France, keeping in mind, of course, that the English language Wikipedia isn't an "All-American" service. Mandsford (talk) 01:36, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well said. « D. Trebbien (talk) 23:06, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete since it's an essay. It's underreferenced and contaons some OR and SYN. Majoreditor (talk) 02:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, original research. Stifle (talk) 14:18, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.