Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Kingdom by-election records
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. (non-admin closure) doktorb wordsdeeds 22:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- United Kingdom by-election records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Largely uncited, unsourced, listicle of cruft, trivia, and miscellaneous items. Wikipedia is not a dumping ground of all this random stuff. doktorb wordsdeeds 17:35, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:43, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Keep but revise. The article certainly has issues but it's a bit unclear why it's been proposed for deletion by the user who has made over 20% of the last 500 edits. Have they only just noticed? Could they not have addressed these issues with some of these edits? It seems the issues would be better dealt with by removing unsourced material and trivia, and perhaps splitting the article, rather than removing the information in its entirety. Suttonpubcrawl (talk) 17:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.