Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United Football Club Philippines (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 17:29, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

United Football Club Philippines

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The first nomination hasn't submitted properly, so I'm nominating it again because it clearly fails WP:FOOTYN since it is not yet participated at any league, and WP:GNG for original research. FairyTailRocks (talk) 09:37, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 23. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 09:39, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 09:51, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is an article about a recently formed team which is only proposed to join the league in the future. I cannot see any significant coverage in reliable sources so it fails WP:GNG. Giant Snowman 09:55, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Looks like a hoax to me. Fenix down (talk) 11:24, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - full of unsourced speculation and fails WP:ORG. The names in the list of prospective players and absence of any GHits are all the signs of a hoax. Interestingly there is some coverage of a similarly named club in England, Philippine United Football Club - [1][2]. The Whispering Wind (talk) 14:26, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 14:40, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - for the sole reason it hasn't played yet, and there isn't enough coverage of it yet. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 23:23, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Blatant hoax. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 11:09, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.