Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/United College of Engineering & Research

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:57, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

United College of Engineering & Research[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence that this is a high visibility research institute. Apart from a few press releases, paid advertisement and primary sources, there is no RS to support WP:NSCHOOLS Vikram Vincent 07:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 07:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 07:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 07:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 07:23, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - searches did not turn up enough to show that it passes WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I didn't found sufficient coverage. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 22:28, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:ORG Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:38, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The only thing out there about this is a few trivial name drops in a couple of articles that mentions teachers of the school and a school directory. None of which is enough to pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG. It doesn't help that there are references in the article either. So, this is a pretty clear delete IMO. --Adamant1 (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.