Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unitarian Universalists for Jewish Awareness
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. W.marsh 20:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Unitarian Universalists for Jewish Awareness (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable organization. No non-trivial mentions in reliable sources and an anemic number of Google hits,none of which leads to a reliable source. Not really a part of the [[Unitarian Universalist Association, so a merger there seems inadvisable. ([1] [2][3]) ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 19:04, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The links in the further reading section of the article are not specifically about this group (although they mention it in passing, but could be the basis for an article on Jews and Unitarian Universalism. ObiterDicta ( pleadings • errata • appeals ) 14:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Appears to be original research - no reliable references. Non-notable group as well. --DizFreak talk Contributions 20:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable UU cruft Bigdaddy1981 03:50, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 05:02, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete Delete as WP:VSCA, just another *cruft article about a non-notable organisation that does not meet the relevant policy. Thewinchester (talk) 06:50, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unless proper sources addedMerge to Unitarian Universalist Independent Affiliate organizations Guycalledryan 07:58, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]- Merge I agree with Guycalledryan. --Devin Murphy 20:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.