Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unit commensurability

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dimensional analysis#Commensurability. I'll redirect. Any editor is free to merge verifiable material. Non-admin closure. Jujutacular ^T · C 06:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unit commensurability[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I don't see much prospect for this to be anything but a dictionary definition, and even as a dicdef it's pretty dubious. Trovatore (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect to Dimensional analysis#Commensurability. --Lambiam 22:33, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Dimensional analysis#Commensurability. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:32, 14 March 2010 (UTC).[reply]
Merge and redirect to Dimensional analysis#Commensurability. Headbomb {talk / contribs / physics / books} 02:58, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment from nominator That seems like a reasonable solution to me. Does someone want to just do it, and close the AfD as moot? --Trovatore (talk) 04:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.