Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unit 13
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Nomination withdrawn per sources found. Non-admin closure. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 17:43, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Unit 13 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Upcoming game, no assertion of any pre-release hype in the gaming community. Delete. Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 06:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I have added two external references to the article and included its appropriate stub-type as well. SaveATreeEatAVegan 06:56, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game-related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) Gongshow Talk 09:23, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Gongshow Talk 09:24, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Plenty of coverage in reliable, third party sources. Many were found in a matter of seconds. Please, read WP:BEFORE. Source List:
- No offense, but I'm not sure what "Gaming Community" you're consulting, this game is getting plenty of coverage, especially considering it's not out yet. Sergecross73 msg me 17:37, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.