Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unirac
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) —Theopolisme (talk) 22:47, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Unirac (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable and it is spam. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 08:27, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Keep Easily meets the WP:CORP requirements, and the article is also very well referenced. Spammy language can easily be fixed with editing. And Adoil Descended (talk) 10:52, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Notable article. Spam is not a reason to delete. It is a reason to be reworked. SL93 (talk) 02:19, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Large market share (notability claim clear), some references, also the Hilti acquisition is kinda interesting...wonder how that works out for them (but they are a big company).TCO (talk) 06:43, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sources found in GNews search plus already supplied references satisfy WP:CORP. Tone is a matter for cleanup. • Gene93k (talk) 14:03, 19 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Enough good references to establish notability. Beagel (talk) 14:31, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.