Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union Soccer Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:49, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Union Soccer Club

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Newly founded amateur soccer club - although well meant, the soccer club probably doesn't pass our notability requirements, set out at WP:N. The club has yet to play an official game. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 20:02, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:53, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article does not appear to clear the verifiability or notability thresholds. If sufficient reliable sources are found to save this article, significant rewriting is advocated to tamp down the overly promotional and informal tone of the article. - Dravecky (talk) 19:04, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per Dravecky. EuroPride (talk) 13:29, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. The club is definately not notable as an amateur team. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:52, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notability. JBsupreme (talk) 07:22, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - way below the required level for notability. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 20:17, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.