Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union Pacific 3967

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Union Pacific Challenger. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:53, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Union Pacific 3967[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Union Pacific 3967

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Locomotive is not notable, there is nothing notable about this specific locomotive. It should not have an article BigSneeze444 (talk) 19:09, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: History, Transportation, Colorado, and Wyoming. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 23:27, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Union Pacific Challenger: if the article ever matures to the level that Union Pacific 3985 is, let's spin it off again as a standalone. Owen× ☎ 00:38, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: no evidence of independent notability. Could be redirected to Union Pacific Challenger, but it's not individually mentioned there (and shouldn't be). Pi.1415926535 (talk) 00:39, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per @Pi.1415926535's rational. TarnishedPath^talk 03:19, 6 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Union Pacific Challenger would be the best choice, given how, while the engine itself lacks standalone notability, it is notable enough for inclusion the article on UP's Challengers. TH1980 (talk) 03:43, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Union Pacific Challenger per above. Locomotive isn't notable enough for a standalone article, but can be mentioned in the main article. Streetlampguy301 (talk) 20:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.