Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Union High School (Washington)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Union High School (Camas, Washington). --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 15:27, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Union High School (Washington)[edit]

Non-notable recently established high school with no page content aside from an infobox. Red Zion^X 23:21, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- No content and no information given as to why this school is notable. -- Imperator3733 (talk) 23:33, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. cab (talk) 00:07, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge (along with the latest improvements) to Union High School (Camas, Washington). This school went to AfD 1 minute after creation. Aparently the nominator did not search before nominating. This nomination is not a proper use of the AfD process. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Union High School (Camas, Washington) – Zedla (talk) 00:33, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or merge with the existing article, obviously. Bearian (talk) 01:57, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect is fine, too. Bearian (talk) 15:03, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think that this article should be deleted because union high school is brand new in the Evergreen School District and the rest of the district wants to know what we are about. It also gives information about the school and valuable links to new students. I didn't create the article to be a nuisance or because I was bored. I created it because I thought it would be good for other students. --Diatommy554 (talk) 04:37, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect to Union High School (Camas, Washington). I would add that 'delete' would preclude the merge, for GFDL reasons, which would be a pity. Trout slapping for nominator for not carrying out adequate research before nominating. TerriersFan (talk) 04:39, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Don't kick the nominator too much for nominating this so quickly, this article was speedily deleted 3 times as obvious vandalism created by User:TheDancingDill. Keep an eye on this one. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.