Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unified conferencing

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 21:54, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unified conferencing[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Pure Original research. Fiddle Faddle 13:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:34, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 13:36, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep or blow it up - there's plenty of coverage of the "concept" itself and unified conferencing has been around as part of the telecommuting debate since the early 2000s and has probably (based on my own quick search) now risen to the level of notability required for inclusion here. However, the article in question is almost entirely original research, as highlighted by the nom. Sure, we could probably find sources for some of what is there but I'd suggest it might be easier to start from scratch. Stalwart111 14:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{*Let's talk!*} 05:33, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 06:16, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Original Research. Topic has not got on in mainstream. Caffeyw (talk) 10:03, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as lacking reliable independent sources with in-depth coverage. If such sources get added to the article, feel free to ping my talk page. Stuartyeates (talk) 02:01, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.