Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unholy grail

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:45, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unholy grail[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable book, by a nn author, with a print on demand publisher. (Author contested prod.) OSborn^arf_contribs. 23:57, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn^arf_contribs. 23:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. -- OSborn^arf_contribs. 23:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Massively fails Wikipedia:Notability (books). St Anselm (talk) 00:07, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Certainly fails the GNG as well as any other notability criteria. Ravenswing 00:48, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can find no significant coverage about this book. In particular, there are no reviews or critical reception in reliable sources with search results returning book sales sites which confirm the book exists, but nothing else. -- Whpq (talk) 14:08, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. You have chosen .... unwisely. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 16:16, 18 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.