Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ung Thi
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Cirt (talk) 07:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Ung Thi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Well-written article, but subject does not meet notability guidelines for people. He is not notable independent of the business he created. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 07:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Delete - The man seems to have achieved many notable things I just can't find anything which covers his life instead of his achievements, in detail. If I could find that I would change my vote. PanydThe muffin is not subtle 19:12, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 01:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 22:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:08, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep He is the great grandson of Emperor Minh Mang, who ruled Vietnam for 21 years, the longest since the 1800s, and before that there were only warlords. This can be veririfed by following the tree YellowMonkey (bananabucket!) 00:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.