Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unequibryologic reasoning
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 21:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Unequibryologic reasoning (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Possible hoax; if not, non-notable concept. Cited sources don't seem relevant (see talk page); linked with hoax article Nathan J. Jerrell; few or no online sources that aren't mirrors. "Unequibryologic thinking is so abstract and free-form it is difficult to tell a genuine usage from an incorrect one, or even a malicious parody" -- perhaps that's what this is? Jfire (talk) 20:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--before nominator's quote from the article, it makes its own case for non-notability: "it remains an essential element of Comarxist, Situationist-Lettrist philosophy." Given that "Comarxism" doesn't exist, the topic's notability is pretty much shot. In all seriousness, there is nothing here. Drmies (talk) 21:19, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, as it has the air of a hoax about it. -- Sharpbrood (talk) 01:52, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
WeakDelete Nothing across extensive research databases on "Unequibryologic." That the word may appear in a few independent texts doesn't imply notability. Looks like either hoax or word salad. If the silly stuff (e.g., about its susceptibility to parody) could be replaced with sensible discussion, it may be possible to rescue it. Jlg4104 (talk) 02:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]- Aw, this is just silliness. Delete it. Jlg4104 (talk) 05:10, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.