Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underworld IV

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Underworld (film series)#Fourth film. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:48, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Underworld IV[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:HAMMER. Released over a year from now, and it is "rumored", which is unclear because it's referred to by name and then as a definite article... either way no references and speculative. Hammer time. Shadowjams (talk) 08:53, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:11, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge/Redirect to Underworld (film series)#Fourth film The film's prospects have received quite a bit of coverage.[1] Per WP:CRYSTAL, it is appropriate to report discussion and arguments about the prospects for success of future proposals and projects or whether some development will occur. Since the article is curently not huge in size, its being merged will not overburden the parent article at Underworld (film series), and for such smaller stubs, such a merge is recommended by WP:NFF. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 23:03, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fine with that. Shadowjams (talk) 06:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.