Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Underwater (course)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:SNOW. Bishonen | talk 16:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Underwater (course)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article should be deleted as it is not notable (fails the WP:GNG). This is because the article is currently unreferenced and a WP:BEFORE search found no useful results. The article is also WP:MILL as it is an article about a course when many others exist (with similar sourcing). -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 14:18, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:23, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what's even meant by "course": "This is a second Super Mario Maker course. This is a underwater course, but can't changed to overworld." This is about Super Mario gameplay? Delete per nom, whatever it is. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:27, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, obviously. Wikipedia is not a video game walkthrough. Yunshui ^雲 _水 14:46, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NOTGUIDE. Exemplo347 (talk) 14:56, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. In no way is this an acceptable article. Maproom (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unclear, unsourced and WP:NOTGUIDE - Remarkably similar to World 8-4 supposedly by a different editor - Arjayay (talk) 14:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – WP:NOTGUIDE. Maybe there's a Wikia wiki the author could move it to? ~barakokula31 (talk) 15:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete subject does not rise to the level of meriting an article. Lepricavark (talk) 15:17, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A WP:MILL article with no claim of importance. TheMagikCow (T) (C) 15:28, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per above. bojo | talk 16:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.