Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under oath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Oath#Modern law. Consensus is that the primary topic for this term is its legal sense. A hatnote will be placed at the target article for the band. Mz7 (talk) 01:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Under oath

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete and redirect to Oath#Modern law. Very clear primary topic, and the band name is not even spaced the same. bd2412 T 15:53, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: According to this revision there are two films (notably without articles) with the same name that may require disambiguation in the future. I'm not sure if that means this disambiguation page should be kept, but I don't think it is as clear cut as it my seem in a quick glance. - Paul^T+/_C 16:19, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- If so, I would move the disambiguation page to Under oath (disambiguation). There is still a primary topic. Absent those articles, a redirect and hatnote will do. bd2412 T 17:35, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  - Agree That makes perfect sense to me! - Paul^T+/_C 17:39, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 17:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect (and Hatnote) - bd2412's altered suggestion seems perfect to me. One extremely secondary topic and two non-created articles don't warrant a frontal disambiguation page. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as sugegsted, perhaps with a hat note. The target article needs sources. Bearian (talk) 02:49, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.