Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Under Attack EP

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Galea Yunshui  12:44, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Under Attack EP[edit]

Under Attack EP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't seem to meet WP:NALBUM. Set of articles which appear to be self-promotion/promotion by someone connected to singer. Boleyn (talk) 08:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, I agree that it doesn't meet the criteria. Mayast (talk) 08:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:20, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The presence of a particular guest artist is not relevant to notability, neither is being played on the radio. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm interpreting this comment to mean that the record has been covered at a source called "Press Party" and one called "Electroqueer" along with coverage in blogs. Links to that coverage would be helpful in determining whether those sources meet the standards for reliability required to establish notability. Blogs, which tend to be self-published and not subject to independent editorial control, generally do not meet those guidelines. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 22:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note to closing admin: Both the IP and User:Kpepper123 have been indefinitely blocked for abusing multiple accounts. Jerry Pepsi (talk) 22:53, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.