Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncyclopedia (6th nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Bad faith nomination, no reasonable rationale given for nomination. --Ezeu 03:12, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

Uncyclopedia

It's notable, but so are ED and Kamelopedia. If you delete the rest, delete this too. Ratherduarm 03:02, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

• If an article has survived 5 AfDs, there must be a reason why. This is Ratherduarm's 4th edit. – Riana ^ऋ 03:04, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • ED should have survived all it's nominations. Ratherduarm 03:09, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.