Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncle Ned Kennedy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete as unsourced material. - Mailer Diablo 16:44, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Uncle Ned Kennedy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
There are no sources cited for this article and a search of the web, academic journals, and LexisNexis news search do not reveal anything. I suspect this is a hoax and at the moment we've no way of proving otherwise. Tuba mirum 17:17, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. This could almost be speedied. YechielMan 02:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fuhghettaboutit 12:10, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as a hoax. I would have remembered this guy from my U.S. History classes had he been real. Anyone that rides 2500 miles on a horse and meets the president would be memorable enough to merit inclusion into our textbooks. --Cyrus Andiron 13:05, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete- no evidence of notability provided- many people meet the President of the United States and ride horses. Thunderwing 13:47, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, does not seem to be a hoax[1], but hardly notable. --Dhartung | Talk 04:02, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Notability is not established. --Crunch 11:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relist One person wants to delete because nobody could have done this, another because many people do. I think longer exposure is needed for the remote possiblility that someone finds some evidence. DGG 09:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.