Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Uncensored With Ali Tajdary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:47, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uncensored With Ali Tajdary[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG for the all existing sources are not reliable and independent. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. Cassiopeia talk 03:39, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closing admin - creator is a sock and admitted to commit WP:Meatpuppetry - see here 1 and SPI report here. Cassiopeia talk 22:26, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

*Keep : hi, there is no reason to delete this program, this is an iranian tv and internet series and has valid links from reputable news outlets as well as the news of this tv show in the national newspaper of iran, a tv and internet series with wide distribution in every country. this collection deals with problems such as addiction, gender problems, certain diseases, etc. in iran, and is also an important collection in this regard. in wikipedia rules, it is preferred. to increase the valid content and finally complete them until they are removed. this program has no reason to delete according to all the rules of wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoseinkandovan (talk • contribs) 21:28, 5 November 2021 (UTC) (blocked sock)[reply]

Note: the above editor is the creator and sole substantive content contributor to this aricle. DMacks (talk) 04:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep : Has coverage in number of Persian publications, so it meets notability. Chelokabob (talk) 09:22, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete All sources are unreliable. 121.185.35.240 (talk) 11:19, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The sources mentioned aren't in WP:RSP, and unless someone can prove to me that they're not reliable on this topic, I'm going to vote keep. ☢️Plutonical☢️ᵀᵃˡᵏ ᵗᵒ ᵐᵉ 14:41, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

~~User mr wiki biography~~

this is a tv series. the tv series of each country are valid. it has links to the newspaper "shoroo" and the news is valid "sarshenasan" "akharinkhabar Agensy", the article does not need to be deleted. it is valid.--Mr wiki biography (talk) 12:33, 7 November 2021 (UTC)(blocked sock)[reply]

Delete, fails WP:GNG, despite what is said above. the tv series of each country are valid tv shows are not automatically notable. Lavalizard101 (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no indication that the subject meets GNG.--Alireza Khabib (talk) 03:12, 9 November 2021 (UTC) striking confirmed blocked sockpuppet, Atlantic306 (talk) 01:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Ali Tajdary was deleted via AFD. DMacks (talk) 04:14, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:25, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Very few reliable sources that has been presented. 112.187.211.184 (talk) 02:26, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per nom as it fails WP:GNG. 103.90.70.131 (talk) 02:10, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 00:28, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – this is a no-brainer if you look at the sources. There are several copies of the same press release, two references to sarshenasan.com which is the company producing and broadcasting the show, and one ref (used twice, no 3 and 5) that gives me a runtime error. Even if that one is independent, it doesn't make the show notable by itself. --bonadea contributions talk 21:47, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.