Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Unbreakable (Dareysteel album) (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unbreakable (Dareysteel album)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The album fails WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. The album did not chart on any country's official chart and was not critically reviewed by any reliable publication. If User:Northamerica1000 doesn't want it redirected, it will need to be deleted. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 12:02, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 12:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 12:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ~SS49~ {talk} 12:16, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment – The last AfD discussion here was closed as no consensus, not as redirect. The nominator herein redirected the article after the last AfD closed (diff), so I reverted that (diff). It's not a matter of what the nominator assumes I want at all, my reversion of the redirection was procedural, and proper. It's important to respect consensus after AfD discussions have concluded, rather than acting unilaterally against other user's opinions. Pinging Ad Orientem, the closer of the last AfD, in the event they may have something to add here. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 16:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:- The album meet WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM. Per Significant coverages in multiple independent reliable sources. Rayoveto (talk) 17:03, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rayoveto: What criterion of WP:GNG and WP:NALBUM does this article meet, and what "reliable sources" are you referring to? You can't just say it meets Wikiepedia's notability requirements without justifying it. You need to justify your argument. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 18:17, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 18:18, 24 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ~SS49~ {talk} 00:32, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Dareysteel, who appears to be just about notable, or if editors feel the search title isn't a viable one, delete. Fails WP:NALBUM – there aren't enough reliable sources to sustain an independent article for the album, because although there appear to be several sources from Nigerian newspapers and online websites, most of them don't appear to be "reliable" and "independent"... a comparison shows that the wording of the various newspaper articles is strikingly similar to each other, suggesting that they were fed a couple of press releases, and each newspaper has just altered a few words here and there and then published it. Richard3120 (talk) 15:57, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sheldybett (talk) 01:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.