Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umeed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deleted per issues with its author. If a neutral editor wishes to recreate it and properly source it, ping me. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:16, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Umeed[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable film with only unreliable refs Wgolf (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:10, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Comment: Under its IMDB title of Ummeed this 53-year-old, waaaay pre-internet film is not unsourcable, appears to be a significant part of a notable's career,[1][2] and has made it into the enduring record. Rather than judge this brand new article on how it looks, I'll choose to await input from Hind-reading Wikipedians able to gauge its notability to Hindi cinema. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 06:04, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-creator has been banned as a sockpuppet. Wgolf (talk) 19:49, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.